Yet again, the Cavalier Daily, my university’s daily student paper, ran an ill informed column on homosexuality. My response is as follows:
I found Mr. Cortes’s attempt to paint himself the victim of intolerance pathetic and laughable. I’m sure the “stares and criticisms” Mr. Cortes had to endure for singing the Not Gay Chant were no doubt unpleasant; as no one likes to be condemned by their peers. However, it should go without saying, that gays have had to put up with far worse—family disownment, bullying, and violence to name a few—as a result of the intolerance supported by individuals like Mr. Cortes and other religious conservatives who share his ideology.
Mr. Cortes’ equating courage with a tasteless taunt indicates severe moral weakness in his argument. Since when is it considered brave (not to mention Christian) to bully an already bullied minority? In what sense is it moral to degrade and trample on the dignity of other individuals? As a society devoted to freedom and equality we must reject Mr. Cortes’ “Christian” notions of bravery and morality. I believe real courage is displayed everyday by openly gay individuals who strive to live their lives with dignity in spite of all of the individuals, groups, traditions, and laws that are aimed at branding them as lesser beings and second class citizens.
Mr. Cortes throws out a straw man in claiming that the Not Gay Chant is not so bad compared to Ahmadinejad’s Iran. Of course that is true; we do live in a democratic society ostensibly devoted to religious freedom, not a third world theocratic state. But this misses the greater point. While Cortes’ method of dealing with gays is by far less severe than the methods of particular Islamic states, the general ideology is the same. Homophobia is homophobia. Any time one’s beliefs, religiously based or otherwise, are based in shaming and degrading homosexuality, one is harming homosexual individuals.
In the United States this means that 33% of gay teens will attempt suicide (Center for Disease Control/Massachusetts Department of Education Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 1999). More gays will be victims of crimes that are based on the perpetrator’s disapproval of homosexuality. The FBI reported that 1,213 gay men and women were victims of hate related crimes in 2005 alone. So no, Mr. Cortez cannot wash his hands of the deadly effects of homophobia in the US by merely contrasting himself to Ahmadinejad. One point of comparison between the two should be emphasized however: both individuals base their anti-gay beliefs in their religion.
Now to address Mr. Cortes’ point on the “suppression” of religious views in the public square. The problem with expressing explicitly religious based arguments in the public square is that not everyone shares the same worldview. In America Mr. Cortes is free to express his Biblically based beliefs against homosexuality all he wants. This does not guarantee him the right to be praised for those beliefs. That’s the beauty of free speech—it helps to create a free market of ideas and allows individuals to critically assess the validity of their beliefs.
In contrast to Mr. Cortes, I believe that homophobia, not homosexuality, is immoral. It degrades individuals and destroys families with gay members. It creates such despair in many gay people that they decide to take their own lives. It creates a situation where violence against gays is condoned and even supported. I urge others to reject Mr. Cortez’s narrow view of morality which supports the degradation of gay individuals and support the dignity of their gay peers by refusing to sing the Not Gay Chant.